```latex \text{If } f : (0, \infty) \to \mathbb{R} \text{ be given by} \text{Then,} \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] f(x) \text{ is monotonically increasing on } [1, \infty) \item[(b)] f(x) \text{ is monotonically decreasing on } (0, 1] \item[(c)] f(x) + f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) = 0, \forall x \in (0, \infty) \item[(d)] f(2^x) \text{ is an odd function of } x \text{ on } \mathbb{R} \end{itemize} ```
Detailed Explanation
Key Ideas
-
Integral with variable limits
For a function the derivative is -
Here
- (a(x) = 1/x) and (b(x) = x).
- (g(t) = \dfrac{e^{-(t + 1/t)}}{t}.)
-
Monotonicity
If (f'(x) > 0) for the interval of interest, (f) is strictly increasing there. -
Symmetry from swapping limits
Reversing the order of an integral changes its sign: With limits (1/x) and (x), flipping them simply gives (-f(x)). -
Oddness through an exponential substitution
Put (x = 2^u). Then (1/x = 2^{-u}). If (f(2^u) + f(2^{-u}) = 0), the new function (F(u) = f(2^u)) satisfies (F(-u) = -F(u)) — the very definition of an odd function.
Simple Explanation (ELI5)
Imagine a see-saw of arrows
- You pick a positive number x.
- From 1/x you draw an arrow all the way up to x.
- Every short piece of that arrow is weighted by a tiny number (e^{-(t + 1/t)}) (this makes pieces near (t = 1) heavier and far-away pieces lighter).
- Add all those tiny weighted pieces – that total is f(x).
Because the same rule is used forward ((1/x \to x)) and backward ((x \to 1/x)), the function behaves like a mirror:
- Push the right end of the see-saw (make x bigger) and the total weight always goes up – it never dips.
- Flip the arrow (swap start and end) and you simply get the negative of what you had.
So:
- From 1 onward the weight only rises.
- From 1 down to tiny numbers it still rises (just in the opposite direction).
- The mirror rule gives (f(x) + f(1/x) = 0).
- Re-label x as (2^x) and the same mirror rule says the graph is an odd curve (symmetric through the origin).
Step-by-Step Solution
Step-by-Step Solution
-
Set up the ingredients
-
Differentiate using Leibniz rule
-
Simplify each term
Hence -
Add them up
-
Sign of the derivative
For every (x>0): (e^{-(x + 1/x)} > 0) and (x > 0). Therefore So (f) is strictly increasing everywhere on ((0,\infty)).• (a) True on ([1,\infty)).
• (b) False (because it increases, not decreases, on ((0,1])). -
Reciprocal relation
(f(1/x) = \int_{x}^{1/x} g(t),dt = -\int_{1/x}^{x} g(t),dt = -f(x)).
So making statement (c) True. -
Oddness after substitution
Let (F(u) = f(2^{u})). Then Therefore (F) is an odd function of (u), verifying statement (d) True.
[\boxed{\text{Correct options: (a), (c), (d)}}]
Examples
Example 1
Growth/decay models where integrating from 1/x to x captures equal percentage bands around 1
Example 2
Optics problems involving lens formulas where reciprocals arise naturally (object distance vs. image distance)
Example 3
Thermodynamic identities using variables T and 1/T to express symmetry in partition functions
Visual Representation
References
- [1]G.B. Thomas & Finney – Calculus, chapter on Differentiation under the Integral Sign
- [2]I.A. Maron – Problems in Calculus of One Variable, monotonicity and derivative tests
- [3]MIT OpenCourseWare – Single-Variable Calculus video lectures (Leibniz Rule)
- [4]Art of Problem Solving forum threads on reciprocal limits in integrals