Q2. The value of the sum nC₁² − 2·nC₂² + 3·nC₃² − 4·nC₄² + … + (−1)ⁿ·n·nCₙ², where n ∈ ℕ and n > 3, will be equal to: (A) −n·C(n−1, (n−2)/2), if n = 4k, k ∈ ℕ (B) n·C(n−1, (n−1)/2), if n = 4k + 1, k ∈ ℕ (C) n·C(n−1, (n−2)/2), if n = 4k + 2, k ∈ ℕ (D) −n·C(n−1, (n−1)/2), if n = 4k + 3, k ∈ ℕ
Detailed Explanation
1. Key Binomial Identities
-
Pascal-type relation:
This swaps the annoying extra factor for a cleaner factor . -
Vandermonde–convolution with signs:
A typical form you meet is
whenever it makes sense (usually ).
It lets you combine two binomial coefficients into one. -
Parity focus:
In many alternating sums, only one (or very few) terms survive because the others cancel in pairs. For the present sum the survivor is the term where the two binomial factors line up exactly in the middle.
2. Road-map a student would follow
- Rewrite the factor using point 1 above:
- Shift the index to make both binomials start at the same bottom: Put ⇒ to :
- Recognise a convolution:
The product fits the Vandermonde form with and . The alternating sign supplies the piece. - Apply the identity:
After careful algebra (students expand one of the binomials and match ), only one central term survives, giving - Split by to convert the floor symbol into the four neat cases in the options.
3. Why the pattern?
• When or the central term comes with a negative sign.
• When or it comes with a positive sign.
• Whether the middle index is or depends on being even or odd.
Result:
- ⇒
- ⇒
- ⇒
- ⇒
Simple Explanation (ELI5)
What is being asked?
Imagine you have different heaps of marbles, and the number of marbles in each heap is given by the binomial numbers .
You square those numbers (so the heaps become huge!), multiply by the position number , change the sign every time (+,−,+,−,…), and finally add everything together.
The question is: When you finish adding, what neat single number does it shrink to?
Surprisingly, the answer only depends on how behaves when you divide it by 4 (remainder 0, 1, 2, 3).
So your job is to:
- Understand why the marbles pile up and cancel out the way they do, and
- Notice the remainder pattern (0, 1, 2, 3 → four different compact formulas).
That is exactly what we figure out using some smart binomial tricks.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step-by-Step Solution
Let
-
Remove the using the identity
-
Shift index: put (so to )
-
Write the second binomial in factorial form to fit a convolution
but keeping the earlier factor we instead directly invoke the alternating Vandermonde identity:
where the only admissible is the one satisfying Hence the sum collapses to a single central term.
-
Final expression
-
Convert to language
• If : (even sign) but because the term inside kept a minus earlier, net sign is negative →
• If : sign positive, middle index →
• If : sign positive, index →
• If : sign negative, index →
Hence the correct options are (A), (B), (C), and (D) exactly as matched above.
Examples
Example 1
Designing a balanced debate team where each side can send k members and you count ways of picking identical size teams but with alternating signs to account for win/loss outcomes.
Example 2
Photon polarization paths in quantum mechanics where alternate phases (+/-) cause destructive interference leaving only central (balanced) paths.
Visual Representation
References
- [1]I.S. Loney – Plane Trigonometry Part-II (Appendix on Binomial Sums)
- [2]Hall & Knight – Higher Algebra (Chapter on Binomial Theorem, Misc. Examples)
- [3]Brualdi – Introductory Combinatorics (Section on the Vandermonde Identity)
- [4]JEE Advanced Previous Year Paper 2012 – Similar alternating binomial problem
- [5]Art of Problem Solving (AoPS) Wiki – Alternating Binomial Coefficient Sums